Git Workflow Comparison
Git Workflow Comparison
Common Git workflows are detailed here.
Choosing the Right Workflow:
- If your team works on smaller projects with simple development cycles, Centralized Workflow or GitHub Flow might work best.
- For larger projects with more structured release management, Gitflow or Feature Branch Workflow would be appropriate.
- If you’re contributing to open-source projects or working in a highly decentralized manner, Forking Workflow is likely the best fit.
- Trunk-based development is ideal if your team values continuous integration and rapid feedback.
Comparison Table
| Workflow | Main Branch | Feature Branches | Release Stages | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centralized Workflow | main/master |
None | None | Small teams with simple projects. |
| Feature Branch | main/develop |
Yes | None | Teams working on parallel development. |
| Gitflow | main, develop |
Yes | release, hotfix |
Larger teams with complex release management. |
| Forking | main |
Yes | None | Open-source or large decentralized teams. |
| GitHub Flow | main |
Yes | None | Continuous delivery teams with simplified workflows. |
| Trunk-Based | main/trunk |
None | Feature Flags | Teams need rapid integration and deployment. |