Pesticide Paradox in Software Testing
Pesticide Paradox in Software Testing
The Pesticide Paradox states that repeating the same tests repeatedly reduces their effectiveness over time, analogous to pests developing pesticide resistance.
- The system becomes “immune” to repetitive tests
- Only surface-level defects are caught initially
- New/deeper defects remain undetected
- Creates false confidence in software quality
Example
Testing a login feature with fixed credentials (e.g., “user123/password123”) might initially find validation errors.
After fixes, the same tests miss new vulnerabilities like SQL injection or session hijacking.
Overcoming the Paradox
- Update test cases regularly
- Combine testing techniques (boundary analysis, exploratory testing)
- Use automated fuzz testing with randomized inputs
- Shift focus between functional and non-functional testing
- Prune obsolete tests and prioritize high-risk areas
Significance
Recognized as one of ISTQB’s 7 core testing principles, it emphasizes the need for:
๐ Continuous test suite evolution
๐ฏ Risk-aware prioritization
๐ Adaptive testing strategies